Recreational monitoring of the Great Sevastopol trails

 E.S. Kashirina1, E.I. Golubeva2

 1Sevastopol Branch of M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russian Federation, Sevastopol, Geroyev Sevastopolya St., 7

E-mail: e_katerina.05@mail.ru

2M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Geography, Environmental Management Department, Russian Federation, Moscow, Leninskie Gory St., 1

E-mail: egolubeva@gmail.com

DOI: 10.33075/2220-5861-2018-4-70-74

UDC 502.578

Abstract:

   The article shows some approaches to the organization of recreational monitoring of the Great Sevastopol trail (Southwest of the Crimean peninsula), as a regional route of active tourism. The results of recreational impacts on soil, vegetation and landscape of the Sevastopol region are analyzed. The regional route that is currently being developed is the Great Sevastopol trail passing from the mouth of the Belbek river to Balaklava. Moreover, the GST route passes through some protected natural areas: landscape  reserves «Bayardsky», «Cape Ayya», «Laspi», the monument of nature «Urochishche «Skaly Laspi».

      In order to assess the state of natural complexes under the conditions of the BSG, the organization of recreational monitoring is needed. The recreational monitoring of the GST should include two blocks: accounting of recreational loads and assessment of the state of the landscape components under their influence. Direct counting of recreants can be supplemented with remote data of open spatial information services – GPSies, Wikiloc, MapMyFitness, etc.

    Some recommendations for the selection of key sites and indicators of the state of soil and vegetation are given. It is determined that the system of recreational monitoring of the Great Sevastopol Trail depends on the landscape structure and should include at least 36 trial plots. In the system of the main components of the landscape monitoring, showing the influence of recreation, the main indicator role belongs to the soil cover, in particular the development of erosion processes and vegetation, its structural and functional features and species composition of communities. The deciduous forests are the most resistant to recreational loads,while juniper high forests and Pitsunda pine are the least resistant. The field studies and calculations revealed that the organization of recreational monitoring in different landscapes and rationing of recreational loads at a level of no more than 100 people. per day/ ha will ensure the sustainable development of active tourism on the trail.

Keywords: tourism, recreational digression, landscape, natural protected areas, GIS-technologies, Sevastopol, Crimea.

Full text in PDF (RUS)

LIST OF REFERENCES

  1. Pozachenyuk E. A., Pankeeva T. V. Geochemical examination of administrative territories. Bolshoy Sevastopol. Simferopol: Business-inform, 2008. P. 298.
  2. Kalynychenko A.A. Concept View on Ecotourism Development in Crimea // Geography, Environment. Sustainability. 2013. Vo1. 6. Nо 1. P. 80–89.
  3. The trail is in harmony with nature. Collection of Russian and foreign experience in creating ecological trails, Moscow: R. Valent, 2007, P. 176.
  4. Kashirina E. S. Prospects for the development of ecotourism in the area from the Bay of Balaklava to C. Aya // Bulletin of the Odessa State University. Geographical and geological Sciences. 2008. Vol. 13. No. 6. P. 79-82.
  5. Great Sevastopol trail on the website Of the government of Sevastopol http://sevastopol.gov.ru/city/turizm/tour-list/bolshaya-sevastopolskaya-tropa.php (date of request 25.04.2018).
  6. Open data portal for tourist route tracks https://www.gpsies.com/?language=ru#10_44.5888_33. 5224_hikebike (date of request 20.05.2018).
  7. Norman P., Pickering C.M. Using volunteered geographic information to assess park visitation: Comparing three on-line platforms // Applied Geography. 2017. Nо 89. P. 163–172.
  8. Recreational forest management in the Mountainous Crimea / A. F. Polyakov, L. F. Kaplyuk, E. I. Savich [et al.] / / Recreational forest management in the USSR. Moscow: Nauka, 1983. P. 95-103.
  9. Temporary methodology for determining recreational loads on natural complexes in the organization of tourism, excursions, mass everyday recreation and temporary norms of these loads. M., 1987. P. 34.
  10. Chizhova V. P. Development of a program for recreational monitoring of a protected natural territory / / Tourism and recreation: fundamental and applied research: proceedings of the international journal. scientific and practical Conf. (Moscow, April 27-28, 2006). Moscow: rib “Tourist”, 2006. P. 392-396.
  11. Golubeva E. I., Zavadskaya A.V. Potential of sustainable development of recreational nature management in specially protected natural territories of the Kamchatka territory // Bulletin of the National Academy of tourism. Saint Petersburg: Premium Press, 2012, No. 4 (24), P. 43-47.

If you have found a spelling error, please, notify us by selecting that text and pressing Ctrl+Enter.

Translate »

Spelling error report

The following text will be sent to our editors: