On a space-time variability and trends of wind stress curl over the Black Sea

E.A. Averyanova, A.V. Gubarev, A.B. Polonsky

Institute of Natural and Technical Systems, RF, Sevastopol, Lenin St., 28

E-mail: eisal@mail.ru, alexgub@inbox.ru, apolonsky5@mail.ru

DOI: 10.33075/2220-5861-2020-1-27-36

UDC 551.553, 551.465.7


    Spatiotemporal variability of wind stress curl over the Black Sea for the period 1980-2018 and linear trends are analyzed, using the data of wind speed from four re-analyses (NCEP-DOE, ERA-Interim, MERRA2, JRA-55). The best agreement between the spatial structures of standard deviation (STD) fields due to interannual variability of wind stress curl (WSC) is found for MERRA2 and ERA-Interim re-analyses. The maximum interannual variability of WSC is located near the coast of Turkey (30 ° ÷ 35 ° E), while the minimum corresponds to Batumi quasistationary anticyclone eddy. Typical STD values of annual mean WSC, averaged over the Black Sea area, slightly differ from each other according to MERRA2, ERA-Interim, and JRA-55 data. These values vary between 9,11⋅10-9 Pa/м and 9,53⋅10-9 Pa/м. Spatial structure of linear trend fields of annual mean WSC values obtained from ERA-Interim and MERRA2 data is characterized by the following similar features:  positive significant trends of WSC correspond to the regions of the western and eastern cyclonic gyres, as well as to the coastal zone near the Bosphorus and the Kerch Strait. Negative significant WSC trend areas are located near the Caucasus coast, and near the shores of Turkey (31 ° ÷ 34 ° E).

     Averaged over the Black Sea mean annual values of WSC for the period 1980–2018 are characterized by significant positive trends according to MERRA2, ERA-Interim. Trends calculated from NCEP-DOE and JRA-55 data are not statistically significant. So, most likely, an increase in cyclonic vorticity, occurred over the Black Sea during the studied period, should cause an intensification of water circulation in the sea.

Keywords: Black Sea, wind stress curl, atmospheric re-analyses, interannual variability, trends.

Full text in PDF(RUS)


  1. Pedlosky J. Geophysical Fluid Dynamics. Springer, 1979. 624 p. DOI: 10.1109/5.771073
  2. Polonsky A.B., Shokurova I.G. Decadal variability of characteristics of the Black Sea pycnocline and geostrophic circulation in the wintertime // Russian Meteorology and Hydrology. V. 34. № 4. P. 243–255.
  3. Capet A., Barth A., Beckers J.-M. et al. Interannual variability of Black Sea’s hydrodynamics and connection to atmospheric patterns // Deep Sea Res. Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography. 2012. 77. P. 128 – 142. DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2012.04.010
  4. Mihaylova E.N., Polonsky A.B., Shokurova I.G. About the relationship between circulation intensity in the Black Sea and the wind field vorticity // Ukrainian hydrometeorological journal. 2013. № 12. P .193–203. URL:nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Uggj_2013 _12_25
  5. Belokopytov V.N. Climatic changes of hydrological regime of the Black Sea: Diss. of Doctor of Geographical Sciences. Sevastopol. 2017. 377 p.
  6. Shokurova I.G. Interannual variability of the wind stress curl in the Black Sea // CITES’2019. 2019. P. 332-335.
  7. Polonsky A.B., Serebrennikov A.N. Low-frequency change of wind fields and geostrophic flows of the Black Sea on satellite data. Part 2: long-term tendencies // Monitoring systems of environment. 2019. №. 4 (37). P. 60-68. DOI: 10.33075/2220-5861-2019-3-60-68
  8. Kanamitsu M., Ebisuzaki W., Woollen J. et al. NCEP-DOE AMIP-II Reanalysis (R-2) // Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. Nov 2002. P. 1631–1643. DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-83-11-1631
  9. Dee D.P., Uppala S.M., Simmons A.J. et al. The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system // Quarterly journal of the royal meteorological society. 2011, 137: 553-597. DOI: 10.1002/qj.828
  10. Ronald G., McCarty W., Suarez M.J. et al. The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications,Version 2 (MERRA-2) // Journal of climate. 15 July 2017. Vol. 30. P. 5419–5454. DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1
  11. Kobayashi S., Ota Y., Harada, Y et al. The JRA-55 reanalysis: General specifications and basic characteristics // Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. Ser. II. 2015. Vol. 93. No 1. P. 5–48. DOI: 10.2151/jmsj.2015-001
  12. Averyanova E.A., Gubarev A.V., Polonsky A.B. On wind stress curl season variablity over the Black sea// Monitoring systems of environment. 2019. №. 4. P. 81-90. DOI: 10.33075/2220-5861-2019-4-81-90
  13. Kendall M.G. Rank Correlation Methods / 4th edition. Charles Griffin. London. U.K. 1975. 272 p.
  14. Mann H.B. Non-parametric    test against trend // Econometrica. 1945. V. 13 P. 245–259.

If you have found a spelling error, please, notify us by selecting that text and pressing Ctrl+Enter.

Translate »

Spelling error report

The following text will be sent to our editors: