Implementation of test-organisms for assessment of the marine pollution level

O.V. Mashukova1, E.N. Skuratovskaya1, 2

 1The A.O. Kovalevsky Institute of Marine Biological Research of RAS, RF, Sevastopol, Nakhimov Av., 2

2Sevastopol State University, RF, Sevastopol, Universitetskaya St., 33


DOI: 10.33075/2220-5861-2019-4-135-144

UDC 628.19(262.5)


     The present study gives the assessment of credibility of existing ideas about the use of test-organisms for identifying the level of various toxicants in the aquatic environment and of real limitations to this methodology. The materials used demonstrate a clear advantage of biophysical methods of testing in comparison with morphological (body size and mass, presence of morphometric signs, etc.) and physiological ones (growth, breathing, survivability, reproduction, etc.) in terms of accuracy, objectivity and efficiency of the information obtained. It is shown that the choice of methods and test-objects for biotesting of marine ecosystems is determined by its objectives and the environment under study. Data used in this work evidence the importance of selecting test-organisms for the study of particular pollutants of a certain group and are sure to demonstrate real limitations to the methodology of using these test-organisms in testing different toxicants in the aquatic environment. When studying the reactions of test-organisms to pollutant impact the main requirement is mainly the need to maintain abiotic parameters of the environment within given ranges during the experiments without going beyond the ecological niche of the species.  Undoubtedly, for further development of methods of biological testing of water areas, much more efforts are required to study two strategies of adaptation process of organisms: rapid acclimatization and long-term adaptation. The former takes place in response to diurnal and seasonal fluctuations of environmental factors as well as to the short-term effect of an excessive dose of some factor or its minimization. The latter occurs due to moderate chronic impact of adverse changes of environmental factors. The answers to these questions are to be provided by further studies that can significantly advance the development of the biological testing methodology of the marine ecosystem and water areas.

Key words: test-objects, biophysical methods, pollutants, marine biota.

To quote, follow the DOI link and use the Actions-Cite option or copy:
[IEEE] O.V. Mashukova and E.N. Skuratovskaya, “IMPLEMENTATION OF TEST-ORGANISMS FOR ASSESSMENT OF THE MARINE POLLUTION LEVEL”, Monitoring systems of environment, vol. 4, pp. 135–144, Dec. 2019.

Full text in PDF(RUS)


  1. Y. A. Izrael, A. B. Zyban the Anthropogenic ecology of the ocean. SPb.: Hydrometeoizdat. 1989. 527 PP.
  2. Tokarev Yu. N. Fundamentals of biophysical ecology of aquatic organisms . Sevastopol: EKOSI-Hydrophysics. 2006. P. 342.
  3. Dyatlov S. E. Role and place of biotesting in complex monitoring of marine environment pollution / / Ecology of the sea. 2000. Vol. 51. P. 83-87.
  4. On the problem of assessing the toxicity of components of the aquatic environment by methods of biological testing / I. G. Kornakova, D. F. Afanasiev, I. E. Tsybulsky [et al. ] / / Questions of fishing. 2008. Vol. 9. No. 4 (36). P. 839-846.
  5. Kamnev A. N. Modern view on the Hydrobiology / Marine biological research: achievements and prospects: materials of vseros. science.- practice. Conf. with internat. participation dedicated to the 145th anniversary of the Sevastopol biological station (Sevastopol, September 19-24, 2016). Sevastopol: EKOSI-Hydrophysics, 2016. Vol. 3. P. 29-32.
  6. Microbial toxicity tests and chemical analysis as monitoring parameters at composting of creosote-contaminated soil / J. Ahtiainen, R. Valo, M. Järvinen [et al.] // Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2002. Vol. 53. Iss. 2. Р. 323–329. DOI: 10.1006/eesa.2002.2225.
  7. Goncharova E. N., Vasilenko M. I. Ecological and Toxicological analysis of the impact of pesticides on the aquatic ecosystem / / Marine biological research: achievements and prospects: materials allros . science.- practice. Conf. with internat. participation dedicated to the 145th anniversary of the Sevastopol biological station (Sevastopol, September 19-24, 2016). Sevastopol: EKOSI-Hydrophysics. 2016. Vol. 3. P. 60-63.
  8. Hart K.A., Pimental D. Environmental and economic costs of pesticide use Encyclopedia of Pest Management. New York: NY. 2002. Р. 237–239.
  9. Assis C.R.D., Bezerra R.S., Carvalho L.B. Fish cholinesterases as biomarkers of organophosphorus and carbamate pesticides // Pesticides in the Modern World – Pests Control and pesticides Exposure and Toxicity Assessment (Ed. M. Stoytcheva). InTech Publ. 2011. Vol. 13. P. 254–278.
  10. Biophysical and biochemical methods at the coastal zone monitoring / E. Skuratovskaya, O. Mashukova, I. Sysoeva [et al.] // International multidisciplinaryscientific geoconference sgem. 2018. Vol. 18. Iss. 3.2. P. 1087–1094. ISBN 978-619-7408-43-0 / ISSN 1314-2704. DOI: 10.5593/sgem2018/3.2.
  11. Mashukova O. V. On the question of the glow of the black sea grebe Pleurobrachia pileus Muller, 1776 / / Bulletin of the Caspian sea. 2018. No. 3 (22). P. 15-20.
  12. Features of bio-indication of oil contamination and surface-active substances on the aquatic organisms of the Baikal. / A. E. Balayan, M. N. saxonov, O. A. Barkhatova [et al. ] / / Marine biological research: achievements and prospects: materials allros. science.- practice. Conf. with internat. participation dedicated to the 145th anniversary of the Sevastopol biological station (Sevastopol, September 19-24, 2016). Sevastopol: EKOSI-Hydrophysics, 2016. Vol. 3. P. 17-20.
  13. Shashkova T. L., Grigoriev Yu. S. Comparative assessment of the sensitivity of survival indicators and trophic activity of Daphnia magna in determining water toxicity / / Volga ecological journal. 2013. №4. P. 439-444.
  14. GOST R 53910-2010 Water. Methods for determining toxicity by slowing the growth of marine unicellular algae Phaeodactylum tricornutum Bohlin and Sceletonema costatum (Greville) Cleve. Moscow: standardinform Publishing house , 2010. P.41.
  15. GOST R 53886-2010 Water. Methods for determining toxicity by survival of marine crustaceans. Moscow: standardinform Publishing house . 2010. P. 35.
  16. From the individual to the community and beyond: water quality, stress indicators and key species in coastal ecosystems / S.J. Hawkins, S.V. Proud, S.K. Spense [et al.]. In: D.W. Sutcliffe (ed.), Water quality and stress indicators in marine and fresh water ecosystems: linking levels of organisation (individual, populations, communities). Plymouth: UK. 1994. P. 35–62.
  17. Zhmur N. S. Toxicological monitoring of water pollution sources / / Toxicological Bulletin. 1999. № 3. Pp. 7-13.
  18. Results and prospects of applying biotesting methods for assessing the toxicity of return waters: Nizhny Novgorod experience / D. B. Gelashvili, Yu. f. Lukichev, M. E. Bezrukov [et al. ] / / Ecology and industry of Russia. 1998. P. 30-36.
  19. Biodiagnostics and assessment of the quality of the natural environment: approaches, methods, criteria and standards of comparison in ecotoxicology: materials of the international journal . Symposium and school (Moscow, MSU, October 25-28, 2016). Moscow: GEOS, 2016. P.434.
  20. Ryabukhina, E. V., Zarubin S. L. Bioassay. Biological methods for determining the toxicity of the aquatic environment: method. instructions. Yaroslavl: Yaroslavl State University. 2006. 64 p.
  21. Tokarev Yu.N., Mashukova O.V. Bioluminescence of the Black Sea Ctenophores-Aliens as an index of their physiological state // Luminescence – An Outlook on the Phenomena and their Applications. Croacia: InTech. 2016. Ch. 14. P. 351–378. DOI: 10.5772/65063
  22. Tokarev Yu. N., Evstigneev P. V. Influence of anthropogenic pollution on bioluminescence of single -celled plankton: in the book. Microalgae of the Black sea : problems of biodiversity conservation and biotechnological use. Sevastopol: EKOSI-Hydrophysics, 2008. P. 414-429.
  23. Evstigneev P. V., Bityukov E. P. Bioluminescence of marine copepods. Kiev: Nauk. Dumka. 1990. P. 144.
  24. Gorbacheva E. A. Assessment of the quality of bottom sediments in coastal areas of the Barents sea using the method of bioassay. Marine biological research: achievements and prospects: materials of vseros. science.- practice. Conf. with internat. participation dedicated to the 145th anniversary of the Sevastopol biological station (Sevastopol, September 19-24, 2016). Sevastopol: EKOSI-Hydrophysics. 2016. Vol. 3. P. 64-67.
  25. Tokarev Yu. N., Evstigneev P. V., Mashukova O. V. Planktonic bioluminescents of the World ocean: species diversity, characteristics of light emission in normal and anthropogenic conditions. Sevastopol: Orianda. 2016. P. 340.
  26. Polikarpov G. G. Accumulation of radionuclides by hydrobionts and its consequences. In the book.: Oceanology. Biology of the ocean. Moscow: Nauka. 1977. Vol. 2. P. 331-332.
  27. Sublethal concentrations of Copper Stimulate Photosystem II Photoinhibition in Chlorella pyrenoidosa / D.V. Vavilin, V.A. Polynov, D.N. Matorin [et al.] // Plant Physiol. 1995. Vol. 146. Iss. 5–6. P. 609–614.
  28. Georgieva L. V. Species composition and dynamics of the phytocene. In the book.: Plankton of the Black sea. Kiev: Nauk. Dumka. 1993. Pp. 31-55.
  29. Podkovkin V. G. Reaction of systems of hormonal -mediator regulation to the geomagnetic field against the background of ionizing radiation. Radiation biology. Radioecology. 1995. T. 35. No. 6. P. 906-909.
  30. The bioluminescence field as an in-dicator of the spatial structure and physio-logical state of the planktonic community at the Mediterranean sea basin / Yu.N. To-karev, E.P. Bityukov, R. Williams [et al.] // The eastern Mediterranean as a laboratory basin for the assessment of contrasting ecosystems. The Netherlands: Kluwer Ac-ademic Publishers. 1999. P. 407–416.
  31. Toxicant induced changes on delayed fluorescence decay kinetics of Cyanoobacteria and green algae: a rapid and sensitive biotest  / F. Leunert, H.P. Grossart, V. Gerhardt [et al.]. PLoS ONE 2013. Vol. 8. Iss. 4. e63127. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063127
  32. Schmidt-Nielsen K. Animal Physiology. Moscow: Mir, 1982. Vol. 1. P. 414.
  33. Bioluminescence in the ocean / J. I. Gitelson, L. A. Levin, P. H. utushev [and others]. SPb.: Hydrometeoizdat. 1992. P. 283.
  34. Linnik P. N. Content of labile fraction of metals in surface waters as an important element in assessing their potential toxicity / / Hydrobiol. journal. 2010. Vol. 46. No. 6. P. 90-104.
  35. Antioxidant capacity of sage grown on heavy metal-polluted soil / I. Stancheva, M. Geneva, M. Hristozkova [et al.] // Physiology Plankton. 2010. Vol. 57. № 6. Р. 857–863.
  36. Mashukova O. V., Tokarev Yu. N. Impact of heavy metals on the glow of Beroe ovata (Ctenophora: Beroida) / / Ecosystems, their optimization and protection. 2012. Vol. 7 (26). P. 229-242.
  37. Cherkashin S. A., Nikiforov M. V., Shelekhov V. A. Use of mortality indicators of predlichinok marine fish for assessing the toxicity of zinc and lead / / Biology of the sea. 2004. Vol. 30. № 3. P. 247-252.
  38. Effect of starvation on the biochemical compositions and respiration rates of ctenophores Mnemiopsis leidyi and Beroe ovata in the Black Sea /E Anninsky, G.A. Finenko, G.I. Abolmasova [et al.] // J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 2005. Vol. 85. № 3. P. 549–561. DOI: 10.1017/S0025315405011471.
  39. Patent 70081 UA, IPC A61K 61/00. Method of complementary studies of marine plankton groups / Yu. n. Tokarev, V. V. Melnikov, V. I. Vasilenko [et al.]. Institute of biology of the South seas. A. A. Kovalevsky, national Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (UA). no. u 2011 13570; declared. 18.11.2011; publ. 25.05.2012. Bull. № 10.
  40. Kordyum E. L., Sytnik K. M. Concept of stress: in the book. Cellular mechanisms of plant adaptation to adverse environmental factors. Kiev: Nauk. Dumka, 2003. P. 11-30.